Online solutions help you to manage your record administration along with raise the efficiency of the workflows. Stick to the fast guide to do 2018 - 2019 USCIS I-864, steer clear of blunders along with furnish it in a timely manner:

How to complete any 2018 - 2019 USCIS I-864 online:

  1. On the site with all the document, click on Begin immediately along with complete for the editor.
  2. Use your indications to submit established track record areas.
  3. Add your own info and speak to data.
  4. Make sure that you enter correct details and numbers throughout suitable areas.
  5. Very carefully confirm the content of the form as well as grammar along with punctuational.
  6. Navigate to Support area when you have questions or perhaps handle our Assistance team.
  7. Place an electronic digital unique in your 2018 - 2019 USCIS I-864 by using Sign Device.
  8. After the form is fully gone, media Completed.
  9. Deliver the particular prepared document by way of electronic mail or facsimile, art print it out or perhaps reduce the gadget.

PDF editor permits you to help make changes to your 2018 - 2019 USCIS I-864 from the internet connected gadget, personalize it based on your requirements, indicator this in electronic format and also disperse differently.

FAQ

How much, on average, do you need to earn to be classified as ‘poor’ in the United States? How much to be classified as ‘rich’?
The Department of Health and Human Services sets the poverty guidelines each year. For 2018, a person meets the poverty threshold if they make $12,140 or less. For a family of 4, the threshold is $25,100. The numbers are quite startling when you look at them, as I cannot imagine how anyone could maintain housing if they make $12,500 a year. I am a proud and loyal American, but I have to admit these numbers are embarrassingly low. To be considered wealthy, you must be making 2 times the median household income which was $59,039 in 2016. Meaning, to be considered wealthy in 2016 your income would need to be at least $118,078. The median income range varies by city.I’ve attached the 2018 poverty threshold chart for your reference.
How much income should a US citizen (resident of Texas) have to sponsor 3 relatives?
It’s right on the USCIS website: Form I-864P, 2018 HHS Poverty Guidelines for Affidavit of SupportTake yourself, anyone living with you and add your three relatives. Find that number on the linked chart. That is the minimum amount of money you need to make to sponsor a relative.
Who should invest in crypto currencies and who should not?
It’s not a question of who should and who should not, but how much.Let me say first, no matter what, it is always smart to have $1,000 to $2,000 in crypto. Will it all crash and go to zero? Even if it does, you only lose $1,000/$2,000, that’s your maximum risk.If it doesn’t crash, $1,000 will already get you quite far. More specifically, it is most likely to yield you $17,000, not bad. Why?Because the last bull runs all had an average return rate of 1,700%.Have a look at the last bull runs.9x over 5 days in 2010 from $0.008-$0.0810x over 5 months in 2010 from $0.08-$140x over 2 months in 2011 from $0.07-$3014x over 3 months in 2013 from $15-$21312x over 2 months in 2013 from $139-$113220x over 7 months in 2018 from $1,000-$19,800Every time there was a 17x bull run with a 70% correction on average and it will happen again. You can check for yourself here Complete Bitcoin Price History Chart + Related Events (2009 - 2018).You want to invest more than $1,000? In general, it is reasonable to invest 10% of your yearly salary and 10% of your total savings.Let’s get more specific and follow my pointers.If you make less than $50,000 a year and you have no savings, you can invest $1,000-$2,000. It would be annoying if it all goes down to zero, but for many people a 17x return on that is the only way out of poverty. So, $1,000-$2,000 would be reasonable.If you make $50,000 per year and you have no other savings, it is reasonable for you to invest $3,000-$5,000, since you can make it back in a year if it all goes to zero.If you make $50,000 per year and have $50,000 in savings, you can safely invest 10% of your salary and 10% of your savings, making it a total of $10,000 with a potential return of $170,000. Not bad.If you make $100,000 per year, have no savings, you can also invest $10,000. This is reasonable, because you can easily make back a possible $10,000 loss in a year.If you make $100,000 per year and have $50,000 in savings, you can get bolder. You can invest 10% of your salary and 20% of your savings, since you have a really good job and there is very little risk for you to slip into poverty. In total, you can invest $20,000 into crypto.If you make $100,000 per year and have $100,000 in savings, you can get even bolder. You can invest 10% of your salary and 30% of your savings, since you have a really good job, very good savings and there is very little risk for you to slip into poverty. In total, you can invest $40,000 into crypto.This ratio stays the same for more savings. If you make $100,000 per year and have $300,000 in savings, you can get even bolder. You can invest 10% of your salary and 30% of your savings, totalling at $110,000. Of course, you could also invest 50% of your savings totalling $160,000, but at this point the risk-reward ratio doesn’t get much more positive with more money invested. You get diminishing returns. Taking the average profit of 1,700% per bull run. $110,000 would already yield you $1.81M. Yes, you can invest $160,000 and get a possible return of $2.7M, but what changes for your when you between $1.81M and $2.7M. You can buy an even bigger apartment or a third car. But at this point this is just gluttony and not healthy anymore. There are so many risks of losing your crypto investment, through theft, forgetting passwords, hacks, making 1 bad margin trade, getting too greedy just once, stupid news that crash the market, it’s not worth taking the additional risk.ConclusionAll in all, you can invest 10% of your annual salary into crypto and 10% of your total savings. If you have more than $50,000 in savings, you can invest 20% or even 30% of your total savings, but beyond that you simply get diminishing returns.Also, once the Bitcoin bull run has gone close to 17x, you can make possibly make another 20x by picking the right altcoins and there are a few more bull runs to come until crypto has conquered the world. There is enough crypto for everybody. Don't put all your savings into it, stay reasonable. With the bitcoin and the altcoin bull run, you can get sufficient returns also for a small investment.Hope this gives you a good guideline as to how to invest your money.Don’t invest more money than you can afford to lose!All of these numbers are for Western countries, they are obviously different for other countries.
How much money should I invest in Bitcoin in 2019?
It’s definitely a good idea.It’s funny, 90% of people buy high and sell low.When Bitcoin is very cheap at $6,000 everyone is scared and won't buy Bitcoin, but when Bitcoin is $20,000, everyone wants to buy and takes out loans and sells their house to buy it.They buy high and sell low, but you need to buy low and sell high. Duh.You need to do it how Warren Buffet says it:"Buy with the cannons, sell with the trumpets.""Be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy".______________How much should you invest?I wrote down a few pointers for that.Let me say first, no matter what, it is always smart to have $1,000 to $2,000 in crypto. Will it all crash and go to zero? Even if it does, you only lose $1,000/$2,000, that’s your maximum risk.If it doesn’t crash, $1,000 will already get you quite far. More specifically, it is most likely to yield you $17,000, not bad. Why?Because the last bull runs all had an average return rate of 1,700%.Have a look at the last bull runs.9x over 5 days in 2010 from $0.008-$0.0810x over 5 months in 2010 from $0.08-$140x over 2 months in 2011 from $0.07-$3014x over 3 months in 2013 from $15-$21312x over 2 months in 2013 from $139-$113220x over 7 months in 2018 from $1,000-$19,800Every time there was a 17x bull run with a 70% correction on average and it will happen again. You can check for yourself here Complete Bitcoin Price History Chart + Related Events (2009 - 2018).You want to invest more than $1,000? In general, it is reasonable to invest 10% of your yearly salary and 10% of your total savings.Let’s get more specific and follow my pointers.If you make less than $50,000 and you have no savings, you can invest $1,000-$2,000. It would be annoying if it all goes down to zero, but for many people a 17x return on that is the only way out of poverty. So, $1,000-$2,000 would be reasonable.If you make $50,000 per year and you have no other savings, it is reasonable for you to invest $3,000-$5,000, since you can make it back in a year if it all goes to zero.If you make $50,000 per year and have $50,000 in savings, you can safely invest 10% of your salary and 10% of your savings, making it a total of $10,000 with a potential return of $170,000. Not bad.If you make $100,000 per year, have no savings, you can also invest $10,000. This is reasonable, because you can easily make back a possible $10,000 loss in a year.If you make $100,000 per year and have $50,000 in savings, you can get bolder. You can invest 10% of your salary and 20% of your savings, since you have a really good job and there is very little risk for you to slip into poverty. In total, you can invest $20,000 into crypto.If you make $100,000 per year and have $100,000 in savings, you can get even bolder. You can invest 10% of your salary and 30% of your savings, since you have a really good job, very good savings and there is very little risk for you to slip into poverty. In total, you can invest $40,000 into crypto.This ratio stays the same for more savings. If you make $100,000 per year and have $300,000 in savings, you can get even bolder. You can invest 10% of your salary and 30% of your savings, totalling at $110,000. Of course, you could also invest 50% of your savings totalling $160,000, but at this point the risk-reward ratio doesn’t get much more positive with more money invested. You get diminishing returns. Taking the average profit of 1,700% per bull run. $110,000 would already yield you $1.81M. Yes, you can invest $160,000 and get a possible return of $2.7M, but what changes for your when you between $1.81M and $2.7M. You can buy an even bigger apartment or a third car. But at this point this is just gluttony and not healthy anymore. There are so many risks of losing your crypto investment, through theft, forgetting passwords, hacks, making 1 bad margin trade, getting too greedy just once, stupid news that crash the market, it’s not worth taking the additional risk.ConclusionAll in all, you can invest 10% of your annual salary into crypto and 10% of your total savings. If you have more than $50,000 in savings, you can invest 20% or even 30% of your total savings, but beyond that you simply get diminishing returns.Also, once the Bitcoin bull run has gone close to 17x, you can make possibly make another 20x by picking the right altcoins and there are a few more bull runs to come until crypto has conquered the world. There is enough crypto for everybody. Don't put all your savings into it, stay reasonable. With the bitcoin and the altcoin bull run, you can get sufficient returns also for a small investment.Hope this gives you a good guideline as to how to invest your money.Don’t invest more money than you can afford to lose!All of these numbers are for Western countries, they are obviously different for other countries.
What are the pros and cons of " One Nation one election"?
The concept of “One Nation, One Election”“One Nation, One Election” means structuring the Indian election cycle in such a manner that elections to Lok Sabha and State Assemblies are synchronized together. In such a scenario, a voter would normally cast his/her vote for electing members of Lok Sabha and State Assembly on a single day and at the same time.To clarify further, simultaneous elections do not mean that voting across the country for Lok Sabha and State Assemblies needs to happen on a single day. This can be conducted in a phase-wise manner as per the existing practice provided voters in a particular constituency vote for both State Assembly and Lok Sabha the same day.Looking at the present scenario and the need for itHigh expenditures involved: As it is evident from the above chart, in 1952, for the first Lok Sabha elections it costed around Rs 10.45 crore, while in 2014 general elections, the government spent almost Rs 3,870.3 crore. Come 2019, and the there was 40% jump from 2014 costing an unprecedented Rs. 50,000 Crores ($7 billion), according to the New Delhi based Centre for Media Studies. And these are just paper records and estimates. Add to this the cost of various incentives like television sets, goats, liquor and other personal goods to influence the voters. It was among the world’s most expensive elections.Total expenditures by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in recently held Karnataka state elections. (Source : Documents submitted to ECI)And this is by the Indian National Congress (INC) for the sameThese are the funds spent by two main political parties of India in the recently held Karnataka elections, BJP and INC.Add to this the funds spent by all other political parties (AITC,BSP, CPI, CPI(M), NCP etc.) that have their candidates multiplied by the number of states. Its hard to imagine that figure.The idea of simultaneous elections is to reduce this overall cost.The funds saved could be put to better use in strengthening the economy, defence, women empowerment, poverty alleviation, education, farmers and a host of other beneficial measures.Expenses for conducting elections are not only incurred by the Election Commission but also by the Government at both the centre and at the state level. The Government of India is burdened with the expenses of conducting elections for the Lok Sabha. With every successive election there is a rise in the expenditure in conducting elections which is a burden on the exchequer. With the implementation of a single election in five years, there will be overall decline in the expenses incurred by the Government which they can utilize for the betterment of the people.Repeated elections of state mean implementation of Model Code of Conduct (MCC) again and again. The MCC prescribes detailed guidelines on what to do and what not to do once the schedule of elections is announced. The important ones include:This means that there is a delay in smoothly carrying out or finishing developmental projects or schemes leading to incomplete or delayed work adding to the problem of the citizens. If all the elections are held once in five years, the states will not be disrupted in their functioning by the operation of MCC and they shall have more time for developmental activities.Frequent elections disrupt normal public life: The Parliamentary Standing committee on Personnel, Public grievances, Law and justice noted that “….frequent elections lead to disruption of normal public life and impact the functioning of essential services. Holding of political rallies disrupts road traffic and also leads to noise pollution”. Continuing further, the Committee suggested that “If simultaneous elections are held, this period of disruption would be limited to a certain pre-determined period of time.”While the deployment of polling officials is still for a smaller duration (typically few days before and after the day of voting and few days before and after the day of counting), the deployment of security forces (particularly the CAPF) is normally throughout the elections and they remain mobile from one place to another.Considering that about 2-5 State Assemblies go to polls every 6 month period as stated previously, this situation leads to a lock-in of CAPF and state police forces for prolonged periods of time.The challengesThe current electoral cycle is such that, in general, there are about 5-7 elections every year in the country. And therefore it will be impossible to synchronize electoral cycles of State Assemblies with Lok Sabha without a one-time extension or curtailment of existing tenures of either most Legislative Assemblies or the Lok Sabha itself. Hence, any solution to implement simultaneous elections would necessarily involve appropriate one-time adjustments to terms of Lok Sabha or State Assembly.To devise such acceptable principles, it is important to see the key constitutional and statutory provisions summarized below:Article 83(2) of the Constitution provides for a normal term of five years for the House of People (Lok Sabha). Article 172 (1) provides for similar tenure for State Legislative Assembly from the date of its first sitting.Both Lok Sabha and State Assemblies do not have a fixed term and can be dissolved earlier than its normal terms.Tenure of the House cannot be extended beyond 5 years except in emergency situation.Section 14 and 15 of the Representation of People Act 1951 empowers the Election Commission of India to notify the elections to both the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies six months prior to the end of the normal terms of the Houses.Impact to voter behavior: The primary hypothesis of this criticism is that Indian voters are not mature / informed enough to differentiate between the voting choices for State Assembly and Lok Sabha in case simultaneous elections are held. This situation could lead to –a) National issues impacting electorate’s behavior for voting in State Assembly elections; orb) State issues impacting electorate’s behavior for voting in Lok Sabha elections. As a result, voter behavior gets influenced and he/she may vote for the same political party, which in most cases may be larger national parties.Recently, Dr. S. Y. Quraishi in an article on simultaneous elections pointed out some additional points as counter-arguments to simultaneous elections. He mentioned the following points“a) Having to face electorate more than once every 5 year enhances the accountability of politicians and keeps them on their toes andb) many jobs are created during elections, boosting the economy at the grass-root levels”.ConclusionElections impact everyone in the entire country – citizens, businesses, administrative machinery, constitutional institutions, political parties, leaders and so on. Eventual implementation of this measure would not only require significant Constitutional and Statutory amendments, it would also require significant consensus amongst the key stakeholders.Without a general consensus and wider acceptance, its intent and efficacy could be compromised. The Constitution does provide sufficient room to make amendments to suit the changing times and needs of the country. This flexibility is not just an enabling tool but in fact a responsibility on Governments to provide the best governance systems, processes and opportunities to its citizens.References:Analysis of Funds Collected and Expenditure Incurred by National Political Parties - Lok Sabha 2004, 2009 & 2014https://niti.gov.in/writereaddat...From 6 paise to Rs 46: Poll expense per electorBharatiya Janata Party (Election Expenditure Report Karnataka, 2018)Indian National Congress (Election Expenditure Report Karnataka, 2018)Recognized National PartiesWhy India’s election is among the world’s most expensiveModel Code of Conduct2014 Indian general election - Wikipedia
Is cryptocurrency a good investment as of August 16 2018?
Bitcoin had quite the year in 2017. We saw its price increase well over 1000% from the beginning of 2017 going from around $1000 all the way up to $19,000 in mid December that same year. That meteoric rise attracted people from all walks of life to invest in bitcoin.That all said, is Bitcoin still a good investment in 2018?In my mind there are two types of people investing in cryptocurrency. Those who believe it represents the future of money and are in support of a decentralized financial system. And the others are those who are simply looking to make money. Now you don’t have to be one or the other, but more often than not the investor is leaning towards one.If you believe in the future of money then you are investing in this currency in hopes to one day use it to make purchases. You are also planning to hold it with hopes that it’s going to appreciate. That said, in order for Bitcoin to ever be used as an ever-day currency it simply cannot fluctuate thousands of dollars a day. The question you need to ask yourself is whether or not it’s going to settle at it’s current price. If you believe it’s going to rise in the long term then you should make the investment knowing you’re going to need to ride through a ton of fluctuation.If you’re simply looking to make money with cryptocurrencies then it’s a simpler answer. Bitcoin is very volatile. As I stated above Bitcoin hit close to $20,000 in mid December 2017 a month later has dropped to about $11,000. When there is market fluctuation of that nature there are opportunities to make money, and lots of it. I would imagine the volatility won’t end anytime soon. That said, if you’re looking to trade on the short game there’s definitely an opportunity.If you’re a first timer in the crypto world I suggest doing some research first.Like any investment you need to be prepared to lose everything. In addition to that you need to continue to do research and stay up to date on current trends. In my personal opinion, Bitcoin still remains a good investment as of August 2018 regardless if you are investing short or long.
If you received universal basic income in the amount that was just enough to keep you above the poverty level, what impact would that have on your life? Would you do anything differently?
First, getting people TO the poverty level doesn’t really solve to much, and how in 2018 we even determine what the poverty level is should really be looked at hard. I don’t think that the old methodology has aged well as there are all kinds of expenses (yes, many are ‘luxuries’) that didn’t exist years ago. If you want to solve problems the discussion should be getting everyone up ABOVE the poverty level by a significant amount. I would argue that the amount would need to be at least $6,000 ($500 a month) above the poverty level.Now, I am not in favor of a UBI wealth redistribution… But to answer your question:I’d have less money.Someone has to FUND the UBI program.. the government simply isn’t going to print more money and hand it out every month, so there will be a massive study to figure out who the supposedly “rich” people are and to then figure out home much the government would need to take from them (including all the overhead costs i.e. waste) to get the people living below the poverty level up to the poverty level.Odds are good that for every dollar handed out the government would need to collect something like $1.60 - there’s going to be a high cost to building this program, like all government programs.Then someone will need to determine how many people live in poverty. Studies vary greatly on this matter and there are numbers as low as 43,000,000 (13.5% of the US) to 100,000,000 (about 1/3 of the US).Now, the question is, how much money is involved. Knowing how many people are living below the poverty line is one thing, the next things is HOW FAR BELOW…As of 2018, here’s the chart:for more info go here:Poverty GuidelinesSo Let’s assume the following:US Population: 327,325,516% in poverty: 20% (likely low)Total people in poverty: 65,465,103Avg to get them TO the poverty level: $2,000Percentage of Americans taxed to fund the cost: 33% (Top 1/3 of tax payers)Number of people funding program: 108,017,421AVERAGE tax bill to the 1/3 of US population: $6,060.61 (oh, wait!)Multiplier to cover the massive government costs: 33%AVERAGE tax bill once government bureaucracy is factored in: $8,060.61Now, look at the make up of the top 1/3 of Americans and figure out how gets hit with a $2,000 tax, a $4,000 tax, a $8,000 tax, a $16,000 tax… where will this stop? If the AVERAGE is $8,000, someone’s going to get hit with a $40,000 tax… that or the bottom of the top 33% is going to be paying far too much.The idea that we’re going to tax successful people to pay for a program that gives a free income to the bottom tier of our society is misplaced. We already fund government programs that do some of this, but we simply can not give away “free money” to people and think this is a long term solution to what is wrong in our society. This is a massively complex social problem and there is no one simple government program that’s going to fix it.