affidavit of support calculator

There is no set amount. But it's not about the money. It's about the per country quotas, the reason you are immigrating (putting up a business, skill, join family already here, etc).Depending on the reason you are immigrating is how much funds you're expected to have - see the instructions on the corresponding immigration form. But the reality is that the inspector is going to want to see a level of responsibility as a citizen of your country, a level of honesty (lying - even a tiny lie - in your application is a great way to have it rejected), an interest in doing the process the right way and a respect for the law.Residency is not for sale.Note that this is the case even if entering as a tourist. The visitor visa process includes a financial review not to see how much money you have, but to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that you will have a reasonable amount of funds for someone who is coming on vacations, that you have practical reasons to return to your country after the visit and that it's unlikely you will be staying to live on a visitors visa instead.

Yes, its possible if your spouse is working here in the US and filling income taxes yearly. The US government is just trying makes sure you can take care of your family without asking for help from the government, which is calculated using your W-2 tax return for the previous 3 years.And on your affidavit of support, your spouse can co-support in the process. Otherwise you can find someone in your family or a friend to help you out on that. But the most important thing is to show you make enough to take care of your family.Good luck.

There are examples when the Symbolical Presidential post became very much significant.Remember 2005, Bihar Election Result:Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam was in Moscow.He was awaken from sleep at 2 AM. A fax was sent to him by the UPA government.And, Next day headline: Bihar Assembly dissolved. Fresh Election announced.It was clear that Nitish Kumar was going to form the government despite hung assembly.As per constitution, vice-president will exercise all the power, in absence of President. But file was not sent to vice-president, Mr. Bhairo Singh Sekhawat, known as BJP supporter.K R Narayanan had an uneasy ties with BJP. He was not able to digest non-congress government. So, he forced every supporting party to give single-single affidavit in support of Atal Bihari Vajpee.Gyani Zail Singh was so loyal to Indira Gandhi that he said that he would sweep the floor if Indira asked to do so.R. Venkataraman immediately invited Rajiv Gandhi to form the government in 1989, even after he lost the election due to Bofors Scam.If something unexpected calculation comes in 2019, the president role will become significant.Hence, every ruling party wants their nominee to hold this post.

I don’t know about typical child support payments. But I can give you a few child support scenarios in California (these scenarios are greatly simplified and leave out factors we would normally put in such as health insurance costs, tax filing status, etc., and there are no daycare costs). These are based upon the child support formula California uses. Every state is required by Federal law to adopt a formula to calculate child support. Some states copy California’s formula. Other states have a completely different formula. The formula California uses is set forth in Family Code Section 4055, and I provided it below (take a look at it; needless to say, attorneys and judges need a support calculator to figure out support; try doing this in your head!).I’ve seen some false information posted here on Quora and other places saying California uses the gross income of the parties to figure out support. California uses the net spendable income for each party along with the percentage of parenting time each parent has. I could be wrong about this, but I believe California has one of the highest amounts of guideline support in the country. Here are some examples, which I have kept gender-neutral:Parent 1 has parenting time with Child 20% of the time (roughly every other weekend). Both parents have income of $1,800. Parent 1 pays child support in the amount of $253 per month. (If Parent 1 had parenting time 49% of the time, child support would essentially be a wash).Same scenario as above, except that Parent1 ones earns $10,000 a month (gross). Parent 1 pays $1,272 a month in support.Same scenario as above, except that Parent2 has no income (so Parent1 earns $10,000; Parent2 Zero). Parent1 pays $1,578 a month in child support.Parent1 earns $1,800 a month, has 20% timeshare, and Parent2 has no income: Parent1 pays $369 a month in support.Parent1 earns $1,800 a month, Parent2 has no income and Parent1 has Child 49% of the time: Parent1 pays $293 a month in child support.Hopefully, these scenarios give you a sense of child support in California. These scenarios are for 2017 (every year is slightly different because of tax consequences).California formula for child support:(a)?The statewide uniform guideline for determining child support orders is as follows: ?CS = K[HN - (H%)(TN)].(b)(1)?The components of the formula are as follows:(A)?CS = child support amount.(B)?K = amount of both parents' income to be allocated for child support as set forth in paragraph (3).(C)?HN = high earner's net monthly disposable income.(D)?H% = approximate percentage of time that the high earner has or will have primary physical responsibility for the children compared to the other parent. ?In cases in which parents have different time-sharing arrangements for different children, H% equals the average of the approximate percentages of time the high earner parent spends with each child.(E)?TN = total net monthly disposable income of both parties.(2)?To compute net disposable income, see Section 4059.(3)?K (amount of both parents' income allocated for child support) equals one plus H% (if H% is less than or equal to 50 percent) or two minus H% (if H% is greater than 50 percent) times the following fraction:Total Net DisposableIncome Per MonthK$0-8000.20 + TN/16,000$801-6,6660.25$6,667-10,0000.10 + 1,000/TNOver $10,0000.12 + 800/TNFor example, if H% equals 20 percent and the total monthly net disposable income of the parents is $1,000, K = (1 + 0.20) x 0.25, or 0.30. ?If H% equals 80 percent and the total monthly net disposable income of the parents is $1,000, K = (2 - 0.80) x 0.25, or 0.30.(4)?For more than one child, multiply CS by:2 children1.63 children24 children2.35 children2.56 children2.6257 children2.758 children2.8139 children2.84410 children2.86(5)?If the amount calculated under the formula results in a positive number, the higher earner shall pay that amount to the lower earner. ?If the amount calculated under the formula results in a negative number, the lower earner shall pay the absolute value of that amount to the higher earner.(6)?In any default proceeding where proof is by affidavit pursuant to Section 2336, or in any proceeding for child support in which a party fails to appear after being duly noticed, H% shall be set at zero in the formula if the noncustodial parent is the higher earner or at 100 if the custodial parent is the higher earner, where there is no evidence presented demonstrating the percentage of time that the noncustodial parent has primary physical responsibility for the children. ?H% shall not be set as described above if the moving party in a default proceeding is the noncustodial parent or if the party who fails to appear after being duly noticed is the custodial parent. ?A statement by the party who is not in default as to the percentage of time that the noncustodial parent has primary physical responsibility for the children shall be deemed sufficient evidence.(7)?In all cases in which the net disposable income per month of the obligor is less than one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), adjusted annually for cost-of-living increases, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the obligor is entitled to a low-income adjustment. ?On March 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, the Judicial Council shall determine the amount of the net disposable income adjustment based on the change in the annual California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, published by the California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Statistics and Research. ?The presumption may be rebutted by evidence showing that the application of the low-income adjustment would be unjust and inappropriate in the particular case. ?In determining whether the presumption is rebutted, the court shall consider the principles provided in Section 4053, and the impact of the contemplated adjustment on the respective net incomes of the obligor and the obligee. ?The low-income adjustment shall reduce the child support amount otherwise determined under this section by an amount that is no greater than the amount calculated by multiplying the child support amount otherwise determined under this section by a fraction, the numerator of which is 1,500 minus the obligor's net disposable income per month, and the denominator of which is 1,500.(8)?Unless the court orders otherwise, the order for child support shall allocate the support amount so that the amount of support for the youngest child is the amount of support for one child, and the amount for the next youngest child is the difference between that amount and the amount for two children, with similar allocations for additional children. ?However, this paragraph does not apply to cases in which there are different time-sharing arrangements for different children or where the court determines that the allocation would be inappropriate in the particular case.(c)?If a court uses a computer to calculate the child support order, the computer program shall not automatically default affirmatively or negatively on whether a low-income adjustment is to be applied. ?If the low-income adjustment is applied, the computer program shall not provide the amount of the low-income adjustment. ?Instead, the computer program shall ask the user whether or not to apply the low-income adjustment, and if answered affirmatively, the computer program shall provide the range of the adjustment permitted by paragraph (7) of subdivision (b).(d)?This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2018, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2018, deletes or extends that date.

I can’t make a concrete recommendation without knowing your income and how you obtained your green card, but here’s your general options:Maryland makes free Medicaid coverage available without a 5-year wait to some low-income immigrants (e.g. refugees). Medicaid Immigration Status RequirementsHowever, before you enroll in Medicaid, please be aware that the government may try to recoup all of your medical expenses from the sponsor who signed the affidavit of support for your immigration petition, which I suspect is your son. Your sponsor’s liability ends when you acquire US citizenship or have worked in the US for 10 years (40 social security credits), whichever comes first.Get a quote for private insurance and insurance subsidies (“premium tax credits”) here: Maryland Health Connection For example, if you were married with an annual income of $25,000, you could get a plan that covers you both for $90 per month after subsidies. Normally, there’s a minimum income required to qualify for subsidies because low-income folks are supposed to go on Medicaid. However, if you do not qualify for Medicaid on account of your immigration status (5-year bar), then you can get subsidies with no minimum income required. The subsidies would get calculated as if you earned $12,140 (single) or $16,460 (married).You can buy into Medicare. (That option is available to legal residents with no work history in the US.) You would have to pay $422 per month per person for Part A (inpatient coverage) and $134 per month for Part B (physician and outpatient coverage). Add about $30 per month for Part D if you also want prescription drug coverage (highly recommended).Some colleges and universities have cheap group policies for their students. Check if you can enroll in 1 course at a nearby college to gain access to their student health insurance plan.You can explore Christian Health Sharing Ministries. These are cheaper than traditional health insurance, but they tend to be very very bad at covering chronic conditions, which tends to make them a bad option for older adults. In addition, Ministries typically require that adults aged 65 or above also enroll in Medicare.You can explore international health insurance plans for immigrants. (Regular travel health insurance policies are void as soon as you take up a residence in the country you’re visiting.) However, these are likely either inadequate or similarly as expensive as private insurance in the US.Whatever you do, please stay away from short-term plans and limited benefit plans like “critical illness” or “accident” plans. The former has too many limitations and exclusions for an older adult. The latter pay a fixed amount per occurrence, which is generally much less than the bill you will receive from your healthcare provider. (e.g. the plan might pay $200 per hospital day, while the hospital charges you $2,000 per day).I hope you are able to find a plan that is affordable for you!

thanks for this wonderful tip! let’s admit it. the laws right now are unfair for some parties. examples (though only applicable in Philippines) are when you are not married and you earn bigger than your partner but will be treated as of equal share, or perhaps you do most of the hard work when you guys set up a business while the other party is just there for verbal support, yet it will be divided equally. true anonymous currencies will actually help us a lot to circumvent those laws not because we are a-holes, but because the law itself is abusive or abused against our favor. to help with more with this article, here is a more detailed way to do it .unlike bitcoin which records your transactions in publicly viewed ledger, monero has several cryptographic measures to make sure that the senders, receivers, and amounts are untraceable even if viewed in the blockchain, rendering companies like chainalysis useless and you can be given this sense of plausible denial . first, you buy moneros on the exchanges ( though KYC verification will apply and they will really know it is you, the US government and other big ones did this to protect their pets named banks) . do not worry, as the only thing they will know is that you bought 100,000$ worth of moneros. here is where the governments starts to lose : yes, most exchanges provide you with a wallet, where they will send your moneros to, however, the transfer from a monero address used by the exchanges to the monero address the exchange gave you is already untraceable. meaning , all the government can trace if coinbase ever gives up your info is that you bought 100,000$ worth of monero, but will not accurately get your owed capital gains tax (though they can calculate it manually) but at this point, it’s a dead end for them once you transfer those moneros to let’s say, 3 more monero addresses.now monero addresses and similar coins (electroneum for example as i find identical wallet creation for both) are not bound to an app which can be hacked by the government if you refuse to give it. they will give you a public wallet key, a private spend key and private view key , in a form of a pdf file. as per personal taste, i don’t save those PDF files in my emails , i either memorize a few, or have a paper copy that is secured somewhere , but have a few of the characters penned out so even if someone can get it, they can’t use the private spend keys. now those paper keys, once lost without virtual copies or memory copies, are lost forever. that can be used to your advantage as the keys are ridiculously long , i can’t even memorize my own monero address without the help of cryptographic drawings i have stored! one wrong input of a private spend key might either say that the address is invalid, or worse, might spend another monero address’s funds which is very bad for a fellow cryptonian.after you split your 100,000$ (or better yet, millions if you are darn rich) to multiple wallets, it is time to claim an affidavit of loss ( usually applicable to the Philippines), have it documented in a public notary that you lost them, and the moneros in them. that way, if during the legal proceedings where they try to get where your money is, you can tell the amount, but you can say you lost the wallet that contains it. they cannot get it . why? here are the following reasons :1.) they don’t consider cryptocurrencies as secured investments. “take at your own risks” means the government will not help you get it.2.) the monero people believes in anonymity while the general crypo-finance world believes independence from the government . if the government asks the monero management (if they can gather 51% of the voting power that is) to find “john’s” wallet and surrender it’s contents, chances are, the gov people will receive 51% mid fingers , not votes. (most cryptonians hate governments due to their close ties with banks, that’s why).3.) it’s meant to be irreversible in the first place.now, here are the only reasons why this will not work, or might even backfire:1.) if cryptocurrencies are illegal in your country. you might go to jail for even having a monero address! then you have it recorded legally, big boo-boo!2.) if cryptocurrencies are legal in your country, but there is a mandate that buying huge amounts will automatically constitute money laundering . we don’t have that problem yet in the Philippines though.3.) if the judge did not believe you, or thought that this was planned all along including your affidavit of loss, (which is going to be a biased decision coming from a man of law) , this will extend your divorce proceedings.4.) if the judge mandates you to sell some of your private property not part of the property division , to compensate for the loss . (e.g. , if the total amount to be divided during the divorce is 1,000,000$ and you have an ancestral house for 500,000$ , and the government tells you that you have to give that house to your spouse because you lost 500,000$ worth of monero) then that is one hell of a backfire my friend.still, im not saying that you do this just to escape what is needed to be done if it is fair for everyone, but again, the trend these century is that even laws are unlawful and unfair to a certain party, specially during divorce and property division.tank you for reading.

Official press conferences are for supposed neutral media person who are one of the pillar of a democracy like ours.More often than not, Modi ji has had first hand experience of the “neutrality” which media in India has. Those were the days when the likes of Modi ji & Amit Shah ji were upcoming National Leaders.Every political leader including yours truly have been burnt some time or other by the biased media in some way or other. Most take it as part of the job and a necessary evil.In case of Modi ji, he simply took an even easier extreme route to communicate directly with the people. The rise of social media only just enabled him to do it without any second thoughts fully ignoring the need for press conference.From a time when media were biased against Modi ji came a time when media was forced to report positively on Modi Ji because of the groundswell of support for him from whole of India.From a time when media person posted silly biased questions in interviews, there came a time when media person had to report every speech and every activity of Modi ji in order to not appear like a silly news channel who doesn't know what it's customers want and like.Media picked the bait and did everything for TRP's or readership as the case may be.As an upcoming leader Modi ji needed media when it roasted him for supposed wrong doings even without any proof of the same.As the most popular leader in Independent India, the media needs him now more than he needs them. Government after all still has Doordarshan to telecast the news which needs to be communicated to the people.Sweet revenge if we can call it.